<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money Supply &#8211; October 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/</link>
	<description>True Economics Applied in the Real World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:24:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nima</title>
		<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Nima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicsjunkie.com/?p=482#comment-19</guid>
		<description>OK, I will ask him. If you could also do this, we&#039;ll be more likely to get an answer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I will ask him. If you could also do this, we&#8217;ll be more likely to get an answer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicsjunkie.com/?p=482#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Yes, but that graph you link to is only looking at the base money supply, which as I understand is too narrow to incorporate the effect of the contraction in credit, so if he were challenged he would simply say that the graph doesn&#039;t show the impact of both base money and credit.

That&#039;s why I would like to see him comment on your graph, which, if I&#039;ve understood it correctly, incorporates the impact of both money and credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but that graph you link to is only looking at the base money supply, which as I understand is too narrow to incorporate the effect of the contraction in credit, so if he were challenged he would simply say that the graph doesn&#8217;t show the impact of both base money and credit.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I would like to see him comment on your graph, which, if I&#8217;ve understood it correctly, incorporates the impact of both money and credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nima</title>
		<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Nima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicsjunkie.com/?p=482#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Check this one out http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/11/parents-pull-kids-from-day-care-and.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this one out <a href="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/11/parents-pull-kids-from-day-care-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/11/parents-pull-kids-from-day-care-and.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicsjunkie.com/?p=482#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I&#039;ve been scrolling round Shedlock&#039;s site for what feels like eons and I couldn&#039;t find anything where he was commenting on this type of evidence.

Great site Nima. I will keep coming back here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I&#8217;ve been scrolling round Shedlock&#8217;s site for what feels like eons and I couldn&#8217;t find anything where he was commenting on this type of evidence.</p>
<p>Great site Nima. I will keep coming back here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nima</title>
		<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Nima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicsjunkie.com/?p=482#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Regarding: &quot;For some reason I can’t post a comment at the end of your “money-supply-and-the-price-of-treasury-bills” article.&quot;

This is a bug in the site that I am currently trying to iron out. Some pages, for some reason, don&#039;t let me activate comments.

Regarding: &quot;...why don’t you send Shedlock your graph of the money supply...&quot;

I do think that Mike knows very well that the money supply is soaring. I believe he said that himself in a post.

As to how exactly the Fed&#039;s actions are affecting business and personal accounts: The massive bailouts are the main reason for this. A lot of money has been injected into the banking system and, it is true, not all of it has made it to business and individual account balances.

However, a fraction of those unbelievable $1.3 trillion  that the Fed has added since November 21 2008 must end up somewhere (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/). The Fed has more than doubled (!!) its asset holdings in 1 year. This is unprecedented. What is a measly $200 billion growth of the money supply when compared to that number?

The money is trickling through and will continue to do so, whether we like it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding: &#8220;For some reason I can’t post a comment at the end of your “money-supply-and-the-price-of-treasury-bills” article.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a bug in the site that I am currently trying to iron out. Some pages, for some reason, don&#8217;t let me activate comments.</p>
<p>Regarding: &#8220;&#8230;why don’t you send Shedlock your graph of the money supply&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I do think that Mike knows very well that the money supply is soaring. I believe he said that himself in a post.</p>
<p>As to how exactly the Fed&#8217;s actions are affecting business and personal accounts: The massive bailouts are the main reason for this. A lot of money has been injected into the banking system and, it is true, not all of it has made it to business and individual account balances.</p>
<p>However, a fraction of those unbelievable $1.3 trillion  that the Fed has added since November 21 2008 must end up somewhere (<a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/)</a>. The Fed has more than doubled (!!) its asset holdings in 1 year. This is unprecedented. What is a measly $200 billion growth of the money supply when compared to that number?</p>
<p>The money is trickling through and will continue to do so, whether we like it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicsjunkie.com/?p=482#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you send this graph to Shedlock and see what he says about that big uptick since August and especialy September. You use a relatively narrow money supply definition, so he can&#039;t blame it on that. I would be interested to see what he had to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you send this graph to Shedlock and see what he says about that big uptick since August and especialy September. You use a relatively narrow money supply definition, so he can&#8217;t blame it on that. I would be interested to see what he had to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicsjunkie.com/?p=482#comment-13</guid>
		<description>For some reason I can&#039;t post a comment at the end of your &quot;money-supply-and-the-price-of-treasury-bills&quot; article.

But I was going to say: why don&#039;t you send Shedlock your graph of the money supply and get him to comment on that huge uptick since August and especially September. After all, you use a narrow definition of the money supply, so he can&#039;t blame the results on that.  I would be really interested to know what he had to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason I can&#8217;t post a comment at the end of your &#8220;money-supply-and-the-price-of-treasury-bills&#8221; article.</p>
<p>But I was going to say: why don&#8217;t you send Shedlock your graph of the money supply and get him to comment on that huge uptick since August and especially September. After all, you use a narrow definition of the money supply, so he can&#8217;t blame the results on that.  I would be really interested to know what he had to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.economicsjunkie.com/money-supply-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicsjunkie.com/?p=482#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Hey Nima

Thanks for posting the money supply by component. I understood from that the growth is primarily in personal and business accounts (including sweeps)and cash. That suggests people are hoarding cash, which is what one would expect, but I still don&#039;t really get how that constitutes an increase in the money supply. How are the Fed&#039;s actions weaving their way into people&#039;s deposit accounts? Are these account balances increasing because of money repatriated from investments in foreign currency assets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nima</p>
<p>Thanks for posting the money supply by component. I understood from that the growth is primarily in personal and business accounts (including sweeps)and cash. That suggests people are hoarding cash, which is what one would expect, but I still don&#8217;t really get how that constitutes an increase in the money supply. How are the Fed&#8217;s actions weaving their way into people&#8217;s deposit accounts? Are these account balances increasing because of money repatriated from investments in foreign currency assets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

